Workflow / released models
Models you can use.
Connections you can follow.
The released Workbench model set, grouped by engineering purpose. Open a family for its tree location, inputs, outputs, theory and guided exercise. Availability also depends on your license.
42 model families in the released Workbench
Choose a formulation in Models, edit its linked source record, connect required inputs in Simulation, then watch a quick workflow update or press Run. Tree nesting shows related methods—not permission to combine every method in one solve. A completed calculation is not a validated design pass.
Live updates or Run?
Small compatible workflows refresh after editing pauses, using the current connected materials, Micro, laminate and case inputs. Larger sampling, mode searches, mesh calculations and process histories require Run after upstream changes. Workbench also switches a workload to Run when measured solver time exceeds its live budget; it never reduces numerical accuracy to stay live.
The Solver control shows Live updates or Run required and can pause automatic updates. Hidden tabs do not start background refreshes. Superseded results are discarded, and all automatic runs retain the same model and license checks. Fast reference-state studies remain separate studies: live scheduling does not create new physical coupling.
∑ Micromechanics
Models browser → Micromechanics · source: Micro
One compatible homogenization model per Micro recipe. Use separate recipes for comparisons; they are not combined in a single ply.
Formulations and study choices
- Halpin–Tsai
- Rule of mixtures
- Modified rule of mixtures
- Chamis
- Mori–Tanaka
- Hashin–Rosen
- Self-consistent scheme
- Woven fabric bridging
- Cox shear-lag elastic
∑ Cure, crystallization & material transport
Models → material-model folders · assigned through Materials
Independent model records can be linked together through material inputs. A saved model must be assigned to a material before it contributes to a simulation.
Formulations and study choices
- Kamal–Sourour autocatalytic
- Kamal–Sourour with diffusion control
- Nth-order Arrhenius
- CHILE (degree of cure)
- UV intensity-dependent cure
- Nakamura–Avrami
- Temperature-dependent tabular
- 1D Fickian diffusion
∑ Thermal transport
Models browser → Thermal transport · source: CASES / Thermal
One transport formulation per thermal case. Select its laminate and configure its own initial conditions and surface cycle; pultrusion additionally requires a distance-based die schedule and pulling velocity.
Formulations and study choices
- 1D transient heat transfer
- 1D steady-state heat transfer
- 1D pultrusion thermal cure
∑ Moisture transport
Models browser → Moisture transport · source: CASES / Moisture
One formulation per moisture analysis. Thermal and moisture analyses can both be linked in Simulation; each needs its own boundary conditions.
Formulations and study choices
- 1D transient moisture diffusion
- 1D steady-state moisture diffusion
∑ Plate · CLT & FSDT
Structural models → Laminate mechanics · CLT / FSDT
Choose a formulation and study. Buckling and modal can be requested together; static bending requires FSDT. These are reference-elastic studies, separate from coupled process or progressive failure.
Formulations and study choices
- CLT
- FSDT
- Static bending
- Modal
- Buckling
- Buckling and modal
∑ Cylinder
Structural models → Cylinder models
Choose one cylinder formulation per case record. Geometry and plies remain shared; thick-wall radial results exclude torsion and process strains.
Formulations and study choices
- Linear thin-wall membrane
- Layerwise thick-wall elasticity
∑ Membrane, bending & beam buckling
Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Membrane, bending & beam
Geometry and the case determine the membrane or beam-test interpretation. Euler buckling requires a compatible beam section and a separate reference-elastic study; it is not a strength or local-buckling pass.
Formulations and study choices
- Linear static
- Linear static with failure indices
- Beam Euler buckling
∑ Layerwise sections, joints & delamination
Structural models → Layerwise sections & joints
Coupled delamination is available only for the layerwise Plate section and needs calibrated interface and ply properties. Lap-shear uses its separate joint geometry and perfectly bonded elastic formulation.
Formulations and study choices
- Layerwise x-z plane strain
- Single-lap x-z plane strain
- Coupled delamination growth
∑ Sandwich bending
Structural models → Sandwich bending
Dedicated sandwich screening. Check core, faces and nominal bond shear separately; peel, mixed-mode debonding and crack growth are not assessed.
Formulations and study choices
- Sandwich three-point bend
∑ Failure & envelope comparison
Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Failure criteria
One primary failure criterion per load. In Response → Failure, compare all eligible theories or a custom selection in the envelope controls. Each theory runs independently; criteria are not blended.
Formulations and study choices
- Maximum stress
- Maximum strain
- Tsai–Hill
- Tsai–Wu
- Hashin
∑ Fatigue S–N
Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Fatigue
Select calibrated S–N curves for each material, direction and stress sign in Fatigue. Different sources can use different models. S–N life does not define residual stiffness or strength.
Formulations and study choices
- Kim–Zhang
- Sendeckyj
- Weibull S–N
- Kohout–Vechet
- Basquin
∑ D6641 · Compression coupon
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Uniform small-strain compression using linked laminate Ex and thickness. Measured compressive strength supplies a screening ratio; fixture, tabs, buckling and failure evolution are not simulated.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · compression coupon
∑ D5379 / D7078 · Shear coupon
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Uniform nominal shear between notches using linked laminate Gxy and thickness. Not a notch/fixture stress field or nonlinear shear solution. Gauge length is the effective shear deformation length, not crosshead travel.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · nominal shear coupon
∑ D5528 · DCB opening
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Ideal Euler–Bernoulli DCB with equal homogeneous 0° arms, each half the linked laminate thickness. No root rotation, shear, large displacement or cohesive growth. Critical load is an initiation estimate from supplied GIc.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · DCB beam compliance
∑ D7905 · ENF sliding
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Ideal equal-arm, homogeneous 0° ENF beam; support span is twice the half-span. Crack must be shorter than the half-span. No shear/root correction or unstable crack growth. GIIc is supplied, not fitted automatically.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · ENF beam compliance
∑ D6671 · Mixed-mode fracture envelope
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Benzeggagh–Kenane envelope from calibrated GIc, GIIc and exponent. Supplied GI/GII are energy-release rates from a separate test reduction or analysis. This does not resolve the MMB lever fixture or propagate a crack.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · BK mixed-mode envelope
∑ D5229 · Moisture uptake calibration
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Homogeneous slab, initially dry, both faces held at equilibrium moisture. Fits diffusivity from two early uptake measurements (both ≤50% saturation) using the square-root-time approximation. Edge ingress and temperature dependence are excluded. Does not overwrite material properties.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · Fickian uptake calibration
∑ D5961 · Bearing / bypass screening
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Single-pin nominal bearing, net-section and shear-out checks with independent measured allowables. Bypass tension is added to net-section load only. No contact, bolt preload, load redistribution or validated bearing–bypass interaction envelope.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · bearing bypass screening
∑ D6484 · Open-hole compression
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Nominal gross/net stress and demand relative to measured open-hole compressive strength for this geometry and layup. This is test-data screening, not an uncalibrated notch-strength prediction. No local buckling or kink-band simulation.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · measured open-hole compression
∑ D6742 · Filled-hole comparison
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Compares user-measured open- and filled-hole compressive strengths using gross-section stress. Use matched layup, hole, environment and fastener condition. Filling a hole does not automatically recover strength; no fastener contact/preload model is applied.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · measured filled-hole comparison
∑ D7136 / D7137 · Impact & CAI assessment
Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab
Incident energy from measured impact velocity; residual compressive strength from measured peak CAI force. Rebound energy estimates energy not returned to the striker, NOT damage energy. No impact/contact solver, damage-area prediction or energy-to-strength extrapolation.
Formulations and study choices
- Virtual test · measured impact and CAI
∑ Open-hole strength
Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Failure criteria → Open-hole strength
Infinite-width, specially orthotropic tension screening. Point and average stress distances must be calibrated independently for this laminate. Not compression, bearing or a joint allowable.
Formulations and study choices
- Whitney–Nuismer open-hole tension
∑ Creep & stress relaxation
Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Creep & stress relaxation
Linear uniaxial response at the calibration temperature. Reference Ex is the instantaneous modulus. Three Maxwell branches; creep is solved from stress equilibrium, not the reciprocal relaxation modulus. No thermal shifting or nonlinear creep.
Formulations and study choices
- Generalized Maxwell · axial Prony
∑ Analytical bonded joint
Structural models → Layerwise sections & joints → Analytical bonded joint
Identical equivalent-elastic adherends, long free arms and a thin elastic adhesive. Compare shear-only Volkersen with eccentric single-lap shear and peel. Not a debonding, plasticity or strength calculation.
Formulations and study choices
- Volkersen & Goland–Reissner joint
∑ LaRC04 failure initiation
Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Failure criteria → LaRC04
NASA LaRC04 linear-shear specialization, evaluated at both faces of every ply under membrane and bending loads. Supplied ply strengths are effective/in-situ values; no automatic thin-ply enhancement. Initiation only, not degradation or nonlinear-shear instability.
Formulations and study choices
- LaRC04 · linear shear
∑ Tool-release shape
Structural models → Tool-release shape
Free CLT release from prescribed ply-local shrinkage/thermal eigenstrains. Corner spring-in is a separate uniform-strain estimate. Stress-free temperature and effective post-gel shrinkage need calibration. No tool friction, cure kinetics or viscoelastic restraint history.
Formulations and study choices
- Free-release eigenstrain & spring-in
∑ Fatigue residual properties
Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Fatigue → Residual properties
Prescribed power-law retention fitted to constant-amplitude tests at a fixed stress ratio, amplitude and temperature. Stiffness and strength have independent coefficients. S–N life alone cannot calibrate either. Does not modify the saved laminate.
Formulations and study choices
- Calibrated residual-property fatigue
∑ Cylinder buckling
Structural models → Cylinder models → Cylinder buckling
Simply supported, thin, specially orthotropic cylinder under uniform axial compression. Discrete Donnell modes; prescribed knockdown factor explores imperfection sensitivity, not a prediction from measured imperfection amplitude. No pressure, torsion, postbuckling or strength pass.
Formulations and study choices
- Donnell cylinder · axial buckling
∑ Uncertainty & sensitivity
Structural models → Uncertainty & sensitivity
Seeded independent uniform sampling of shared modulus, ply-thickness and angle offsets. Recomputes laminate ABD for each sample. Bounds are assumptions, not measured distributions. Percentiles and sensitivity are exploratory, not reliability certification.
Formulations and study choices
- Seeded laminate uncertainty
∑ Wiener series and parallel
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Wiener series and parallel
Positive lossless dielectric bounds; complex directional estimates.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Wiener series and parallel
∑ Looyenga / Landau–Lifshitz–Looyenga
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Looyenga / Landau–Lifshitz–Looyenga
One cube-root mixing law, not two independent models.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Looyenga / Landau–Lifshitz–Looyenga
∑ Maxwell–Garnett
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Maxwell–Garnett
Dilute subwavelength spherical inclusions in a host.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Maxwell–Garnett
∑ Normal-incidence laminate TMM
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Normal-incidence laminate TMM
Coherent isotropic nonmagnetic layers between air half-spaces.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Normal-incidence laminate TMM
∑ Bruggeman symmetric EMT
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Bruggeman symmetric EMT
Two positive-permittivity phases; no explicit contact network.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Bruggeman symmetric EMT
∑ EM Mori–Tanaka
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → EM Mori–Tanaka
Scalar principal-axis ellipsoidal field approximation.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · EM Mori–Tanaka
∑ EM self-consistent
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → EM self-consistent
Scalar principal-axis self-consistency; spherical case equals Bruggeman.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · EM self-consistent
∑ Differential effective medium
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Differential effective medium
Incremental mixing with time-step refinement check.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Differential effective medium
∑ Coated sphere and interphase
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Coated sphere and interphase
Concentric subwavelength coated spheres; no dynamic Mie scattering.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Coated sphere and interphase
∑ Generalized multiphase EMT
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Generalized multiphase EMT
Spherical multiphase Bruggeman with convergence checks.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Generalized multiphase EMT
∑ Oblique polarized laminate TMM
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Oblique polarized laminate TMM
TE or TM waves; scalar isotropic layers, no polarization conversion.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · Oblique polarized laminate TMM
∑ 1D transmission line matrix
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → 1D transmission line matrix
Normal-incidence lossless delay-line mesh with pulse decay, energy and mesh-refinement safeguards. Explicit Run required; not a 3D solver.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · 1D transmission line matrix
∑ 1D Floquet–Bloch periodic layers
Models → Electromagnetics · RF → 1D Floquet–Bloch periodic layers
Lossless isotropic A/B unit-cell eigenvalues, folded Bloch phase and stop-band attenuation at normal incidence. Not arbitrary-cell homogenization.
Formulations and study choices
- EM · 1D Floquet–Bloch periodic layers
Reference theory versus released functionality
The wider theory library also describes research and compiled-solver formulations. Event-driven Henry–Pimenta RVE, stochastic discontinuous-fiber failure, Puck, nonlinear-shear LaRC04, impact and general 3D finite-element analysis are not selectable hosted Workbench models. Cox elastic short-fiber homogenization and the separate linear-shear LaRC04 study are available within their stated limits.
Reference-state studies run separately from coupled process or progressive analyses. Residual-fatigue results do not automatically update optimization properties. Tool release uses prescribed eigenstrains rather than importing a cure history.
