Capabilities / 02.5

Follow heat and moisture
through the thickness.

Set the initial state and independent top and bottom schedules, then follow the steady-state or transient response through the thickness before structural analysis. Use effective ply transport properties to study cure exotherm, cure-dependent modulus, polymer kinetics and water uptake or release, and compare candidates through process-cycle optimization.

02.5 / Workbench — Process & environmental responseOpen full-size view ↗
Prepregging Live Process GUI with six heating zones and four rollers

Visualize the moving web, process zones and roller arrangement before inspecting temperature and pressure along the line. Existing Workbench GUI capture; illustrative process settings.

Workbench capture · September 2026 asset collection. This capture shows the interface with demo data. It is not a new solver run or a validation certificate. Control locations may differ in later releases.

CDS2026a development preview

IR lamps and radiant heaters

Plan radiant heating with point lamps, finite tube lamps or rectangular emitter panels. Compare source geometry, placement and absorbed irradiation before choosing a process arrangement.

Explore source geometry
Moving workpieceTravelActive barrel
Conceptual source geometry, not a Workbench capture or calculated flux map.

A finite emitting barrel with active length and diameter

The model integrates radiation over the cylindrical sidewall. A bare tube emits around its full circumference, with non-emitting end caps.

No reflector is assumed. Rotating the tube does not redirect all its power downward.

Hardware: point lamps use total radiant power in W. Finite tube and panel sources use active dimensions plus total W or surface exitance in W/m².

Installation: X/Y/Z position, tilt and azimuth. Finite sources also offer emitter roll. Composite and roller absorptance are independent.

Review: substrate and roller irradiation maps, partial shadows and Standard/Fine source integration.

Direct absorbed irradiation feeds a width-averaged, through-thickness thermal calculation. These controls do not add lateral temperature conduction, reflections or temperature-driven re-emission. The new positioned-source path is separate from the existing ATP/AFP IR-emitter model.

Source setup, flux review and model limits →

Preview of active development. Availability in your installed or public Workbench release must be checked separately. Teaching hardware requires optical and thermal calibration.

Workbench exercise preview

03.62 · Thick laminate: reaction heating, cure gradient and process stress

Level 4
Advanced
Est. 40 min

Connected study preview, not a live calculation. Edit inputs and inspect results in Workbench.

Enlarge workflow ↗
03.62 · Thick laminate: reaction heating, cure gradient and process stress · Fixed layout with all supplied blocks · not solved results
About this workflow view

All blocks keep the CREATE / DISCOVER / SIMULATE positions, with Equipment below Geometry; unused records remain disconnected. This changes the view only, not the exercise records. The diagram shows the setup, not solved results.

∑ Used models & submodels

Only models assigned to records used by this exercise are listed here. The full-layout option preserves the supplied starter records; no Workbench records are changed.

Halpin–Tsai · T700 / EP180 UD · Thermal processing

One compatible homogenization model per Micro recipe. Separate recipes compare models; their predictions are not blended.

∑ Theory & assumptions
CLT · Linear static with failure indices · Plate — Nx Static Validation · Thermal laminate warping

Shared laminate stiffness drives this membrane/CLT path. Failure criteria are independent comparisons, not blended models. Fatigue is a separate assessment.

∑ Theory & assumptions
1D transient heat transfer · T700 Thermal Process · Thermal laminate warping

Needs linked laminate properties and a compatible process schedule. A linked cycle is not a solved temperature history.

∑ Theory & assumptions
Maximum stress · Plate — Nx Static Validation · Thermal laminate warping

Primary ply criterion for Plate — Nx Static Validation · Thermal laminate warping. Envelope comparisons are independent; criteria are not blended.

∑ Theory & assumptions
Data travelling between blocks

Micro → Laminates
Predicted ply stiffness, strength, density and expansion properties.

Materials → Micro
Constituent stiffness, strength, density and thermal / moisture properties.

Mechanical → Simulation
SIMULATION selects this case and its analysis model; the case owns its applicable cycle and input references.

Laminates → Mechanical
Ply angles and thicknesses, stiffness, mass and ply properties.

Geometry → Mechanical
Part shape and dimensions, thickness or section definition, and model-specific geometric inputs. Each selected case consumes only the dimensions its model supports.

Thermal → Simulation
SIMULATION selects this case and its analysis model; the case owns its applicable cycle and input references.

Laminates → Thermal
Ply angles and thicknesses, stiffness, mass and ply properties.

Equipment → Thermal
Linked lasers, IR/UV lamps, heaters, coolers and molds: dimensions, radiant power or prescribed temperature / heat flux, contact conductance, body and surface materials. Each boundary keeps its own placement, side and exposure.

Models → Micro
Applied model assignment: Halpin–Tsai. Model parameters and formulation are used by Micro.

Models → Mechanical
Applied model assignment: CLT · Linear static with failure indices. Model parameters and formulation are used by Mechanical.; Maximum stress

Models → Thermal
Applied model assignment: 1D transient heat transfer. Model parameters and formulation are used by Thermal.

Run the 6 mm laminate through the 120°C dwell with its linked resin reaction heat.

Models: Heat transfer · Classical laminate theory · Extension–bending coupling · Thermomechanical coupling

Study scope and limitations

Teaching inputs, not qualified allowables. Sequential coupling transfers the reported thermal/moisture state to laminate mechanics; it is not simultaneous 3D multiphysics. Inspect the transferred state and reference values before interpreting stress or curvature. Free laminate CLT curvature, not fixture-constrained distortion, a full tool-release simulation or calibrated cure-shrinkage prediction.

Model availability depends on your license. The preview does not run or save a calculation.

02.5 / How to use it

What to set, compare and check
01

Set the boundary schedules

For either heat or moisture, start with compatible material properties, a laminate and initial conditions. Define a separate surface schedule for each type of load.

02

Thermal and moisture formulations

Choose the steady or transient transport model for the study. Transient histories resolve the supported one-dimensional through-thickness problem.

03

Cure, crystallization and UV

Link calibrated material laws to calculate the supported polymer-state changes. For UV cure, supply the exposure inputs. For pultrusion, define the distance/time relationship and pulling speed.

04

Supported coupling

A process schedule alone is not a solved history. Only compatible coupled analyses consume recovered environmental fields; reference-elastic studies remain separate.

05

Tool-release shape

The separate free-release CLT study uses prescribed temperatures and effective shrinkage. It is not a tool-contact simulation or an automatic transfer of the thermal cure history.

06

Process optimization

Compare bounded cycle candidates against the supported objectives. Save the validation data, then rerun the candidate you select.

Explore the models, connections and theory →

What to check and where it applies

  • Transport is one-dimensional through laminate thickness.
  • Thermal and moisture analyses require separate boundary definitions.
  • Cure, crystallization and residual-shape parameters require calibration.
  • Tool-release shape is a separate prescribed-eigenstrain study, not tool contact or automatic cure-history release.
2D cross-section of an automated tape placement process with through-thickness thermal and moisture fields
Planar ATP cross-section showing placement heating, environmental boundaries, and through-thickness thermal–moisture response.
Controls and workflow details · 5 features
  • Steady / transient thermal and moisture selections
  • Initial state and independent surface boundary histories
  • Assigned cure, crystallization and cure-dependent modulus models
  • Supported pultrusion and UV cure studies
  • Bounded process optimization and saved candidate results
Next capability02.6 Structural performance