Set the boundary schedules
For either heat or moisture, start with compatible material properties, a laminate and initial conditions. Define a separate surface schedule for each type of load.
Capabilities / 02.5
Set the initial state and independent top and bottom schedules, then follow the steady-state or transient response through the thickness before structural analysis. Use effective ply transport properties to study cure exotherm, cure-dependent modulus, polymer kinetics and water uptake or release, and compare candidates through process-cycle optimization.

Visualize the moving web, process zones and roller arrangement before inspecting temperature and pressure along the line. Existing Workbench GUI capture; illustrative process settings.
Workbench capture · September 2026 asset collection. This capture shows the interface with demo data. It is not a new solver run or a validation certificate. Control locations may differ in later releases.CDS2026a development preview
Plan radiant heating with point lamps, finite tube lamps or rectangular emitter panels. Compare source geometry, placement and absorbed irradiation before choosing a process arrangement.
The model integrates radiation over the cylindrical sidewall. A bare tube emits around its full circumference, with non-emitting end caps.
No reflector is assumed. Rotating the tube does not redirect all its power downward.
Hardware: point lamps use total radiant power in W. Finite tube and panel sources use active dimensions plus total W or surface exitance in W/m².
Installation: X/Y/Z position, tilt and azimuth. Finite sources also offer emitter roll. Composite and roller absorptance are independent.
Review: substrate and roller irradiation maps, partial shadows and Standard/Fine source integration.
Direct absorbed irradiation feeds a width-averaged, through-thickness thermal calculation. These controls do not add lateral temperature conduction, reflections or temperature-driven re-emission. The new positioned-source path is separate from the existing ATP/AFP IR-emitter model.
Source setup, flux review and model limits →Preview of active development. Availability in your installed or public Workbench release must be checked separately. Teaching hardware requires optical and thermal calibration.

Existing Solved Prepreg 05 GUI capture: prescribed surrounding temperatures and solved plate surface temperatures are distinguished. This is a prepregging example, not an ATP result or validated production window.
Connected study preview, not a live calculation. Edit inputs and inspect results in Workbench.
Conceptual setup, not a solved result. Use the existing live process view in Workbench to inspect this exercise’s linked equipment, boundary settings and results.
All blocks keep the CREATE / DISCOVER / SIMULATE positions, with Equipment below Geometry; unused records remain disconnected. This changes the view only, not the exercise records. The diagram shows the setup, not solved results.
Only models assigned to records used by this exercise are listed here. The full-layout option preserves the supplied starter records; no Workbench records are changed.
One compatible homogenization model per Micro recipe. Separate recipes compare models; their predictions are not blended.
∑ Theory & assumptionsShared laminate stiffness drives this membrane/CLT path. Failure criteria are independent comparisons, not blended models. Fatigue is a separate assessment.
∑ Theory & assumptionsNeeds linked laminate properties and a compatible process schedule. A linked cycle is not a solved temperature history.
∑ Theory & assumptionsPrimary ply criterion for Plate — Nx Static Validation · Thermal laminate warping. Envelope comparisons are independent; criteria are not blended.
∑ Theory & assumptionsMicro → Laminates
Predicted ply stiffness, strength, density and expansion properties.
Materials → Micro
Constituent stiffness, strength, density and thermal / moisture properties.
Mechanical → Simulation
SIMULATION selects this case and its analysis model; the case owns its applicable cycle and input references.
Laminates → Mechanical
Ply angles and thicknesses, stiffness, mass and ply properties.
Geometry → Mechanical
Part shape and dimensions, thickness or section definition, and model-specific geometric inputs. Each selected case consumes only the dimensions its model supports.
Thermal → Simulation
SIMULATION selects this case and its analysis model; the case owns its applicable cycle and input references.
Laminates → Thermal
Ply angles and thicknesses, stiffness, mass and ply properties.
Equipment → Thermal
Linked lasers, IR/UV lamps, heaters, coolers and molds: dimensions, radiant power or prescribed temperature / heat flux, contact conductance, body and surface materials. Each boundary keeps its own placement, side and exposure.
Models → Micro
Applied model assignment: Halpin–Tsai. Model parameters and formulation are used by Micro.
Models → Mechanical
Applied model assignment: CLT · Linear static with failure indices. Model parameters and formulation are used by Mechanical.; Maximum stress
Models → Thermal
Applied model assignment: 1D transient heat transfer. Model parameters and formulation are used by Thermal.
Run the 6 mm laminate through the 120°C dwell with its linked resin reaction heat.
Models: Heat transfer · Classical laminate theory · Extension–bending coupling · Thermomechanical coupling
Teaching inputs, not qualified allowables. Sequential coupling transfers the reported thermal/moisture state to laminate mechanics; it is not simultaneous 3D multiphysics. Inspect the transferred state and reference values before interpreting stress or curvature. Free laminate CLT curvature, not fixture-constrained distortion, a full tool-release simulation or calibrated cure-shrinkage prediction.
02.5 / How to use it
What to set, compare and checkFor either heat or moisture, start with compatible material properties, a laminate and initial conditions. Define a separate surface schedule for each type of load.
Choose the steady or transient transport model for the study. Transient histories resolve the supported one-dimensional through-thickness problem.
Link calibrated material laws to calculate the supported polymer-state changes. For UV cure, supply the exposure inputs. For pultrusion, define the distance/time relationship and pulling speed.
A process schedule alone is not a solved history. Only compatible coupled analyses consume recovered environmental fields; reference-elastic studies remain separate.
The separate free-release CLT study uses prescribed temperatures and effective shrinkage. It is not a tool-contact simulation or an automatic transfer of the thermal cure history.
Compare bounded cycle candidates against the supported objectives. Save the validation data, then rerun the candidate you select.
Explore the models, connections and theory →
What to check and where it applies