Capabilities / 02.6

Connect laminate behavior to
structural performance.

Choose a compatible released plate, cylinder, beam, section, joint or analytical study. Shared laminate inputs do not make every model combination valid.

02.6 / Workbench — Structural performanceOpen full-size view ↗
Workbench Response stress view with global component curves across the laminate thickness

Through-thickness stress plots distinguish ply-level component response. This capture illustrates the CLT view, not an FSDT benchmark.

Workbench capture · September 6, 2026. Representative interface and demo data, not a new solver run or validation certificate. Control locations may differ in later releases.

02.6 / How CDS solves it

From engineering question to evidence
01

Plate and beam response

Use the released CLT/FSDT finite-plate or membrane/beam path with compatible dimensions, loads and supports. Buckling, modal and static bending are distinct study choices.

02

Cylinder formulations

Thin-wall membrane and layerwise thick-wall elasticity have different load and process limits. Donnell axial buckling is a separate thin-shell study with an explicit knockdown factor.

03

Sections and joints

Layerwise sections, lap joints and sandwich bending have their own geometry and interfaces. The analytical Volkersen / Goland–Reissner study is a separate identical-adherend elastic approximation.

04

Failure and notches

The five existing criteria support eligible CLT first-ply / progressive calculations. LaRC04 linear-shear initiation and calibrated open-hole strength are separate studies, not additional progressive choices.

05

Fatigue

S–N models predict life from calibrated data. Residual stiffness / strength requires independently fitted retention laws in its separate study; neither automatically changes optimization properties.

06

Creep, shape and uncertainty

Reference-state studies explore time response, prescribed-eigenstrain free release and bounded ABD sampling. Their scope, inputs and output handoffs are listed below.

07

Keep evidence connected

Run the selected Simulation after relevant edits. Review model assumptions, stale-result warnings, convergence and calibration before interpreting the result.

Released models, connections and theory

Complete model directory ↗

Plate · CLT & FSDT

Structural models → Laminate mechanics · CLT / FSDT

InputsLaminate stiffness, finite plate dimensions, supported edges and study choiceResults / handoffFSDT static bending or selected buckling / modal results; not progressive damage

Choose a formulation and study. Buckling and modal can be requested together; static bending requires FSDT. These are reference-elastic studies, separate from coupled process or progressive failure.

Formulations and study choices
  • CLT
  • FSDT
  • Static bending
  • Modal
  • Buckling
  • Buckling and modal
Cylinder

Structural models → Cylinder models

InputsLaminate, cylinder dimensions and formulation-compatible pressure / axial loadingResults / handoffThin-wall membrane response or layerwise radial fields, with distinct assumptions

Choose one cylinder formulation per case record. Geometry and plies remain shared; thick-wall radial results exclude torsion and process strains.

Formulations and study choices
  • Linear thin-wall membrane
  • Layerwise thick-wall elasticity
Membrane, bending & beam buckling

Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Membrane, bending & beam

InputsLaminate, compatible section and static or Euler load caseResults / handoffMembrane / bending response or separate Euler buckling result

Geometry and the case determine the membrane or beam-test interpretation. Euler buckling requires a compatible beam section and a separate reference-elastic study; it is not a strength or local-buckling pass.

Formulations and study choices
  • Linear static
  • Linear static with failure indices
  • Beam Euler buckling
Layerwise sections, joints & delamination

Structural models → Layerwise sections & joints

InputsSection or lap geometry, laminate, loads and calibrated interface propertiesResults / handoffx–z fields; coupled ply damage and delamination only for the supported layerwise plate path

Coupled delamination is available only for the layerwise Plate section and needs calibrated interface and ply properties. Lap-shear uses its separate joint geometry and perfectly bonded elastic formulation.

Formulations and study choices
  • Layerwise x-z plane strain
  • Single-lap x-z plane strain
  • Coupled delamination growth
Sandwich bending

Structural models → Sandwich bending

InputsFaces, core, dimensions and three-point-bend loadResults / handoffDeflection and separate face, core and nominal bond-shear screening

Dedicated sandwich screening. Check core, faces and nominal bond shear separately; peel, mixed-mode debonding and crack growth are not assessed.

Formulations and study choices
  • Sandwich three-point bend
Failure & envelope comparison

Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Failure criteria

InputsEligible CLT load case, strengths / strain limits and selected criterionResults / handoffFirst-ply envelopes or supported progressive ply-damage histories; criteria are not blended

One primary failure criterion per load. In Response → Failure, compare all eligible theories or a custom selection in the envelope controls. Each theory runs independently; criteria are not blended.

Formulations and study choices
  • Maximum stress
  • Maximum strain
  • Tsai–Hill
  • Tsai–Wu
  • Hashin
Fatigue S–N

Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Fatigue

InputsIntact ply stresses, cyclic loads and measured S–N calibrationResults / handoffSeparate life assessment; no automatic laminate degradation

Select calibrated S–N curves for each material, direction and stress sign in Fatigue. Different sources can use different models. S–N life does not define residual stiffness or strength.

Formulations and study choices
  • Kim–Zhang
  • Sendeckyj
  • Weibull S–N
  • Kohout–Vechet
  • Basquin
D6641 · Compression coupon

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffUniform small-strain compression using linked laminate Ex and thickness. Measured compressive strength supplies a screening ratio; fixture, tabs, buckling and failure evolution are not simulated.

Uniform small-strain compression using linked laminate Ex and thickness. Measured compressive strength supplies a screening ratio; fixture, tabs, buckling and failure evolution are not simulated.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · compression coupon
D5379 / D7078 · Shear coupon

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffUniform nominal shear between notches using linked laminate Gxy and thickness. Not a notch/fixture stress field or nonlinear shear solution. Gauge length is the effective shear deformation length, not crosshead travel.

Uniform nominal shear between notches using linked laminate Gxy and thickness. Not a notch/fixture stress field or nonlinear shear solution. Gauge length is the effective shear deformation length, not crosshead travel.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · nominal shear coupon
D5528 · DCB opening

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffIdeal Euler–Bernoulli DCB with equal homogeneous 0° arms, each half the linked laminate thickness. No root rotation, shear, large displacement or cohesive growth. Critical load is an initiation estimate from supplied GIc.

Ideal Euler–Bernoulli DCB with equal homogeneous 0° arms, each half the linked laminate thickness. No root rotation, shear, large displacement or cohesive growth. Critical load is an initiation estimate from supplied GIc.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · DCB beam compliance
D7905 · ENF sliding

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffIdeal equal-arm, homogeneous 0° ENF beam; support span is twice the half-span. Crack must be shorter than the half-span. No shear/root correction or unstable crack growth. GIIc is supplied, not fitted automatically.

Ideal equal-arm, homogeneous 0° ENF beam; support span is twice the half-span. Crack must be shorter than the half-span. No shear/root correction or unstable crack growth. GIIc is supplied, not fitted automatically.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · ENF beam compliance
D6671 · Mixed-mode fracture envelope

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffBenzeggagh–Kenane envelope from calibrated GIc, GIIc and exponent. Supplied GI/GII are energy-release rates from a separate test reduction or analysis. This does not resolve the MMB lever fixture or propagate a crack.

Benzeggagh–Kenane envelope from calibrated GIc, GIIc and exponent. Supplied GI/GII are energy-release rates from a separate test reduction or analysis. This does not resolve the MMB lever fixture or propagate a crack.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · BK mixed-mode envelope
D5229 · Moisture uptake calibration

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffHomogeneous slab, initially dry, both faces held at equilibrium moisture. Fits diffusivity from two early uptake measurements (both ≤50% saturation) using the square-root-time approximation. Edge ingress and temperature dependence are excluded. Does not overwrite material properties.

Homogeneous slab, initially dry, both faces held at equilibrium moisture. Fits diffusivity from two early uptake measurements (both ≤50% saturation) using the square-root-time approximation. Edge ingress and temperature dependence are excluded. Does not overwrite material properties.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · Fickian uptake calibration
D5961 · Bearing / bypass screening

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffSingle-pin nominal bearing, net-section and shear-out checks with independent measured allowables. Bypass tension is added to net-section load only. No contact, bolt preload, load redistribution or validated bearing–bypass interaction envelope.

Single-pin nominal bearing, net-section and shear-out checks with independent measured allowables. Bypass tension is added to net-section load only. No contact, bolt preload, load redistribution or validated bearing–bypass interaction envelope.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · bearing bypass screening
D6484 · Open-hole compression

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffNominal gross/net stress and demand relative to measured open-hole compressive strength for this geometry and layup. This is test-data screening, not an uncalibrated notch-strength prediction. No local buckling or kink-band simulation.

Nominal gross/net stress and demand relative to measured open-hole compressive strength for this geometry and layup. This is test-data screening, not an uncalibrated notch-strength prediction. No local buckling or kink-band simulation.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · measured open-hole compression
D6742 · Filled-hole comparison

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffCompares user-measured open- and filled-hole compressive strengths using gross-section stress. Use matched layup, hole, environment and fastener condition. Filling a hole does not automatically recover strength; no fastener contact/preload model is applied.

Compares user-measured open- and filled-hole compressive strengths using gross-section stress. Use matched layup, hole, environment and fastener condition. Filling a hole does not automatically recover strength; no fastener contact/preload model is applied.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · measured filled-hole comparison
D7136 / D7137 · Impact & CAI assessment

Models → Structural models → ASTM · Virtual Test Lab

InputsLinked laminate and explicit specimen, load or measured calibration inputsResults / handoffIncident energy from measured impact velocity; residual compressive strength from measured peak CAI force. Rebound energy estimates energy not returned to the striker, NOT damage energy. No impact/contact solver, damage-area prediction or energy-to-strength extrapolation.

Incident energy from measured impact velocity; residual compressive strength from measured peak CAI force. Rebound energy estimates energy not returned to the striker, NOT damage energy. No impact/contact solver, damage-area prediction or energy-to-strength extrapolation.

Formulations and study choices
  • Virtual test · measured impact and CAI
Open-hole strength

Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Failure criteria → Open-hole strength

InputsSpecially orthotropic laminate, hole radius, unnotched strength and calibrated distancesResults / handoffPoint / average stress strength screening and radial stress profile

Infinite-width, specially orthotropic tension screening. Point and average stress distances must be calibrated independently for this laminate. Not compression, bearing or a joint allowable.

Formulations and study choices
  • Whitney–Nuismer open-hole tension
Creep & stress relaxation

Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Creep & stress relaxation

InputsLaminate Ex, Prony fractions / times and held stress or strain at calibration temperatureResults / handoffSeparate axial creep and relaxation curves with time-refinement safeguards

Linear uniaxial response at the calibration temperature. Reference Ex is the instantaneous modulus. Three Maxwell branches; creep is solved from stress equilibrium, not the reciprocal relaxation modulus. No thermal shifting or nonlinear creep.

Formulations and study choices
  • Generalized Maxwell · axial Prony
Analytical bonded joint

Structural models → Layerwise sections & joints → Analytical bonded joint

InputsIdentical equivalent-elastic adherends, adhesive, overlap, width and tensile forceResults / handoffVolkersen shear and Goland–Reissner shear / peel; no debond growth

Identical equivalent-elastic adherends, long free arms and a thin elastic adhesive. Compare shear-only Volkersen with eccentric single-lap shear and peel. Not a debonding, plasticity or strength calculation.

Formulations and study choices
  • Volkersen & Goland–Reissner joint
LaRC04 failure initiation

Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Failure criteria → LaRC04

InputsLaminate, membrane / bending resultants and calibrated effective ply strengthsResults / handoffLinear-shear LaRC04 initiation indices at ply faces; no progressive degradation

NASA LaRC04 linear-shear specialization, evaluated at both faces of every ply under membrane and bending loads. Supplied ply strengths are effective/in-situ values; no automatic thin-ply enhancement. Initiation only, not degradation or nonlinear-shear instability.

Formulations and study choices
  • LaRC04 · linear shear
Tool-release shape

Structural models → Tool-release shape

InputsLaminate and prescribed temperatures, CTE and effective post-gel shrinkageResults / handoffFree-release CLT curvature and separate corner spring-in estimate; not an automatic process-history handoff

Free CLT release from prescribed ply-local shrinkage/thermal eigenstrains. Corner spring-in is a separate uniform-strain estimate. Stress-free temperature and effective post-gel shrinkage need calibration. No tool friction, cure kinetics or viscoelastic restraint history.

Formulations and study choices
  • Free-release eigenstrain & spring-in
Fatigue residual properties

Structural models → Laminate mechanics → Fatigue → Residual properties

InputsModulus, independently fitted stiffness / strength retention laws, life and elapsed cyclesResults / handoffResidual-property curves for the specified constant-amplitude calibration; saved laminate is unchanged

Prescribed power-law retention fitted to constant-amplitude tests at a fixed stress ratio, amplitude and temperature. Stiffness and strength have independent coefficients. S–N life alone cannot calibrate either. Does not modify the saved laminate.

Formulations and study choices
  • Calibrated residual-property fatigue
Cylinder buckling

Structural models → Cylinder models → Cylinder buckling

InputsThin specially orthotropic shell, radius, length, axial compression and prescribed knockdownResults / handoffIdeal / knocked-down Donnell axial buckling and governing mode; no pressure or postbuckling

Simply supported, thin, specially orthotropic cylinder under uniform axial compression. Discrete Donnell modes; prescribed knockdown factor explores imperfection sensitivity, not a prediction from measured imperfection amplitude. No pressure, torsion, postbuckling or strength pass.

Formulations and study choices
  • Donnell cylinder · axial buckling
Uncertainty & sensitivity

Structural models → Uncertainty & sensitivity

InputsLaminate, bounded modulus / thickness / angle variations, seed and axial loadResults / handoffABD axial-strain percentiles and signed correlations; not certified reliability

Seeded independent uniform sampling of shared modulus, ply-thickness and angle offsets. Recomputes laminate ABD for each sample. Bounds are assumptions, not measured distributions. Percentiles and sensitivity are exploratory, not reliability certification.

Formulations and study choices
  • Seeded laminate uncertainty
Normal-incidence laminate TMM

Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Normal-incidence laminate TMM

InputsExplicit dielectric A/B layers, thicknesses, repetition, frequency and supported polarizationResults / handoffReflection, transmission, absorption and shielding spectra; no mechanical coupling

Coherent isotropic nonmagnetic layers between air half-spaces.

Formulations and study choices
  • EM · Normal-incidence laminate TMM
Oblique polarized laminate TMM

Models → Electromagnetics · RF → Oblique polarized laminate TMM

InputsExplicit dielectric A/B layers, thicknesses, repetition, frequency and supported polarizationResults / handoffReflection, transmission, absorption and shielding spectra; no mechanical coupling

TE or TM waves; scalar isotropic layers, no polarization conversion.

Formulations and study choices
  • EM · Oblique polarized laminate TMM
1D transmission line matrix

Models → Electromagnetics · RF → 1D transmission line matrix

InputsExplicit dielectric A/B layers, thicknesses, repetition, frequency and supported polarizationResults / handoffReflected and transmitted pulse histories and spectra; mesh and energy checks

Normal-incidence lossless delay-line mesh with pulse decay, energy and mesh-refinement safeguards. Explicit Run required; not a 3D solver.

Formulations and study choices
  • EM · 1D transmission line matrix
1D Floquet–Bloch periodic layers

Models → Electromagnetics · RF → 1D Floquet–Bloch periodic layers

InputsExplicit dielectric A/B layers, thicknesses, repetition, frequency and supported polarizationResults / handoffPeriodic-cell eigenvalues, folded Bloch phase and stop-band decay

Lossless isotropic A/B unit-cell eigenvalues, folded Bloch phase and stop-band attenuation at normal incidence. Not arbitrary-cell homogenization.

Formulations and study choices
  • EM · 1D Floquet–Bloch periodic layers

Outcomes and boundaries

  • Compatibility and model licensing are checked for the selected Simulation.
  • Finite-plate, thick-wall cylinder and reference-state analytical studies have distinct assumptions.
  • Impact, ballistic tile and general 3D finite-element solves are not offered in the hosted release.
  • Teaching inputs and software checks do not establish experimentally qualified allowables.

Delivered capability

Methods available in CDS
01

Plate CLT/FSDT, membrane/beam and Euler studies

02

Thin-wall and layerwise cylinder models; separate Donnell buckling

03

Layerwise sections, lap joints, sandwich bending and supported cohesive growth

04

Five existing criteria, separate LaRC04 initiation and open-hole strength

05

Calibrated S–N and separate residual-property fatigue

06

Axial creep / relaxation, prescribed-eigenstrain tool release and bounded uncertainty

Next capability02.7 Engineering evidence & automation